Iran not complying with nuclear obligations for first time in almost 20 years, says UN watchdog
The UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors has found that Iran is not complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years.
It comes as sources have told US media that Israel is considering taking military action against Iran in the coming days - without American support.
Iran said it has "always adhered" to the safeguard obligations laid down by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Tehran said it "has no choice but to respond to this political resolution", and said it would launch a new enrichment site "in a secure location".
"Other measures are also being planned and will be announced subsequently," Iran said.
The reports come as US President Donald Trump is said to be in advanced discussions with Iran about a diplomatic deal to curtail the Middle Eastern country's nuclear programme.
However Mr Trump told the New York Post's "Pod Force One" podcast that he was "getting more and more less confident about" an agreement.
Iran will not abandon what it views as its right to enrich uranium, contrary to US demands, a senior Iranian official said on Thursday.
Last week, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that abandoning such enrichment was "100%" against the country's interests.
Israel and the US have long feared that Iran's nuclear programme aimed to develop a nuclear weapon, something Tehran has repeatedly denied.
The 2015 Iran deal signed by President Barack Obama sought to place limits on Iran's uranium enrichment in exchange for the lifting of sanctions. However, President Trump ultimately pulled America out of the agreement.
There has been a recent effort to strike a new deal as fears of Iran's nuclear programme persist in the volatile region.
Israel is said to have become more serious about a unilateral strike on Iran, particularly with reports that a deal between the US and Iran could include provisions about uranium enrichment. Israel views those provisions as unacceptable.
Such a strike would be a dramatic break with the Trump administration's foreign policy.
With tensions in the region simmering as the nuclear discussions unfold and with the potential for unrest, the US State Department ordered the evacuation of all non-essential personnel from its embassy in the Iraqi capital, Baghdad.
America has also authorised - rather than ordered - the departure of non-essential personnel and family members from Bahrain and Kuwait
What is going on?
Dr Burcu Ozcelik, a Middle East expert at the RUSI thinktank, said it is important to bear in mind that there is "a high level of psychological operation manoeuvring at play".
"This is a tactic by all involved parties as each tests the others' threshold even as talks continue in parallel," she added in comments shared with Sky News.
She said one possible scenario is that the US announcement of partial evacuation of embassy staff is a way to signal readiness for military escalation, something she described as a "high-risk gamble".
"The US may be prepping to deter Iranian retaliation in case of an Israeli strike - but it is unclear if it's real strategy or leverage-building posturing to pressure Tehran into a 'quick deal'."
Another possibility, Dr Ozcelik says, is that a first round of strikes against Iran may not directly involve nuclear sites, but other critical national infrastructure to increase pressure and reduce Iranian commitment to its negotiating position, particularly on the point about zero enrichment.
-SKY NEWS
