PM repeats 'moral case' for welfare cuts despite major rebellion among Labour MPs

The prime minister said there was a "clear moral case" for his reforms, which include measures designed to slash £5bn a year from the welfare bill by 2030.

While many Labour MPs initially indicated they backed the bill in principle, support has ebbed away over recent months amid warnings about the impact the cuts could have on the most vulnerable in society.

Around 119 Labour MPs have now signed a "reasoned amendment" to oppose the government's proposals - which, if passed, would effectively kill the legislation.

But speaking to Sky News' political editor Beth Rigby from the NATO summit at the Hague, the prime minister said the welfare system needed reform and was "not working for anyone".

He said the planned vote for Tuesday was not a confidence vote in his leadership but a vote on the need to reform the system.

"I think most colleagues do accept the case for reform," he said.

"We've got to get on and make that reform because the options are: leave the system as it is, trusting people and not helping them, that's not a Labour option. The Labour option is to reform it and make it fit for the future. So we're going to press ahead with these reforms."

Welfare system 'unsustainable'

Sir Keir told reporters on the way to the summit that there was a "moral case" for reform, with around 1,000 people a day going on to PIP - equivalent to the size of the population of Leicester.

"That is not a system that can be left unreformed, not least because it's unsustainable, and therefore you won't have a welfare system for those that need it in the future," he continued.

"So those that care about a future welfare system have to answer the question - 'how do you reform what you've got to make sure it's sustainable for the future?'"

Introduced in March, the government's welfare bill outlines proposals to make it harder for some disabled people to qualify for personal independence payment (PIP) while also cutting another benefit, Universal Credit.

The most controversial elements of the government's welfare bill are changes to PIP and Universal Credit.

PIP is money for people who have extra care needs or mobility needs as a result of a disability.

People who claim it - some of whom are in work - are awarded points depending on their ability to do certain activities, such as washing and preparing food, and this influences how much they will receive.

Under the plans, from November 2026, people will need to score a minimum of four points in at least one activity to qualify for the daily living element of PIP - instead of fewer points across a broader range of tasks the person needs help with.

Currently, the standard rate is given if people score between eight and 11 points overall, while the enhanced rate applies from 12 points. The changes do not affect the mobility component of PIP.

And from April next year, the health element of Universal Credit will be frozen in cash terms for existing claimants at £97 per week until 2029/2030.

For new claimants from April 2026, the health element of Universal Credit will be reduced to £50 per week. However, ministers point to the fact that the Universal Credit standard allowance will increase from £92 per week in 2025-26 to £106 per week by 2029-30.

Overall, 3.2 million families are expected to lose an average of £1,720 by the end of 2030 due to the changes.

It is these changes that have caused the most anxiety among MPs. As one Labour MP told Sky News: "If the thrust of the policy is getting people into work, how does cutting support for people in work, work?

"The thrust of the proposals is right but cutting PIP and Universal Credit isn't about getting people back into work, it's about saving money."

The reasoned amendment, which has now been signed by 119 Labour MPs, calls on the government to delay its flagship proposals pending an assessment of the impact of cuts to PIP.

It also cites concern about the the government's own figures which show 250,000 people could be pushed into poverty as a result of the changes and the fact the provisions have not been subject to a formal consultation with disabled people.

One Labour MP who signed the amendment told Sky News there was a "broad sense of unease across all levels of the parliamentary party".

"Almost everyone thinks there needs to be reform and there are a lot of god things in the bill, but elements need more thought and explanation if they are going to proceed," they said.

"Unless those issues are revised, or much better explained and justified, I don't think there is enough support for the measures.. People are really worried there is a rush to do this and that we might sleepwalk into this as we have done with other issues."

On Tuesday, Downing Street suggested the vote would still go ahead despite the public concerns of some MPs - including influential chairs of parliamentary select committees.

Asked whether the government was confident it could pass the legislation, a Number 10 spokesman told reporters: "We are focused on delivering last week's bill and engaging, talking to colleagues, as to why this reform is so important."

Pressed on whether the vote was happening next week, they added: "I would never get ahead of parliamentary business. It's scheduled for next week. We are committed to reforming welfare."

-SKY NEWS