Emergency ban on puberty blockers by Tory government was lawful, High Court rules

Campaign group TransActual, and a young person who cannot be named, had challenged then health secretary Victoria Atkins's decision to impose "banning orders" on puberty blockers, which delay puberty by suppressing the natural production of sex hormones.

On Monday, Mrs Justice Lang dismissed the challenges, which had argued the ban on private prescriptions of the drugs to treat under 18s was unlawful.

The High Court in London heard at a hearing on 12 July that they should not have introduced an emergency ban because secondary legislation already prevents the prescription of puberty blockers from European or private prescribers, and restricts NHS provision within clinical trials.

But, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and the Department of Health in Northern Ireland defended the claim and said the case should be dismissed.

Mrs Justice Lang, dismissing the case, said: "This decision required a complex and multi-factored predictive assessment, involving the application of clinical judgment and the weighing of competing risks and dangers, with which the court should be slow to interfere."

They imposed the ban on the basis of the independent Cass Review into gender identity services for children and young people, which found there is "no good evidence on the long-term outcomes of interventions to manage gender-related distress".

Before the ban, private clinics could prescribe puberty blockers despite them no longer being available on the NHS in England, unless children were participating in a research trial.

The High Court heard there are concerns the temporary ban could be made permanent by new Labour ministers.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he was "treading cautiously" in his decision as there was "lots of fear and anxiety".

He faced criticism from his own Labour colleagues for the decision, with Labour's LGBT group saying earlier this month they had "concerns" about an indefinite ban.

-SKY NEWS